GapMind for Amino acid biosynthesis

 

L-lysine biosynthesis in Shewanella loihica PV-4

Best path

asp-kinase, asd, dapA, dapB, dapD, dapC, dapE, dapF, lysA

Also see fitness data for the top candidates

Rules

Overview: Lysine biosynthesis in GapMind is based on MetaCyc pathways L-lysine biosynthesis I via diaminopimelate (DAP) and succinylated intermediates (link), II with DAP and acetylated intermediates (link), III with DAP and no blocking group (link), V via 2-aminoadipate and LysW carrier protein (link), and VI with DAP aminotransferase (link). Most of these pathways involve tetrahydrodipicolinate and meso-diaminopimelate, with variations in how the amino group is introduced. Pathway V instead involves L-2-aminoadipate and LysW-attached intermediates. Lysine biosynthesis IV (link), via 2-aminoadipate and saccharopine, is only reported to occur in eukaryotes and is not described here.

25 steps (18 with candidates)

Or see definitions of steps

Step Description Best candidate 2nd candidate
asp-kinase aspartate kinase Shew_1079 Shew_0521
asd aspartate semi-aldehyde dehydrogenase Shew_2308
dapA 4-hydroxy-tetrahydrodipicolinate synthase Shew_1848 Shew_2362
dapB 4-hydroxy-tetrahydrodipicolinate reductase Shew_2840
dapD tetrahydrodipicolinate succinylase Shew_2638
dapC N-succinyldiaminopimelate aminotransferase Shew_0578 Shew_1950
dapE succinyl-diaminopimelate desuccinylase Shew_1862 Shew_2793
dapF diaminopimelate epimerase Shew_0323
lysA diaminopimelate decarboxylase Shew_0322 Shew_0779
Alternative steps:
dapH tetrahydrodipicolinate acetyltransferase Shew_2638 Shew_2974
dapL N-acetyl-diaminopimelate deacetylase Shew_2688
DAPtransferase L,L-diaminopimelate aminotransferase
dapX acetyl-diaminopimelate aminotransferase
ddh meso-diaminopimelate D-dehydrogenase
hcs homocitrate synthase Shew_3472
hicdh homo-isocitrate dehydrogenase Shew_2760 Shew_3471
lysJ [LysW]-2-aminoadipate semialdehyde transaminase Shew_0578 Shew_3172
lysK [LysW]-lysine hydrolase
lysN 2-aminoadipate:2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase Shew_3172 Shew_0578
lysT homoaconitase large subunit Shew_3470
lysU homoaconitase small subunit Shew_3469
lysW 2-aminoadipate/glutamate carrier protein
lysX 2-aminoadipate-LysW ligase
lysY [LysW]-2-aminoadipate 6-phosphate reductase Shew_0202
lysZ [LysW]-2-aminoadipate 6-kinase

Confidence: high confidence medium confidence low confidence
? – known gap: despite the lack of a good candidate for this step, this organism (or a related organism) performs the pathway

This GapMind analysis is from Apr 09 2024. The underlying query database was built on Apr 09 2024.

Links

Downloads

Related tools

About GapMind

Each pathway is defined by a set of rules based on individual steps or genes. Candidates for each step are identified by using ublast (a fast alternative to protein BLAST) against a database of manually-curated proteins (most of which are experimentally characterized) or by using HMMer with enzyme models (usually from TIGRFam). Ublast hits may be split across two different proteins.

A candidate for a step is "high confidence" if either:

where "other" refers to the best ublast hit to a sequence that is not annotated as performing this step (and is not "ignored").

Otherwise, a candidate is "medium confidence" if either:

Other blast hits with at least 50% coverage are "low confidence."

Steps with no high- or medium-confidence candidates may be considered "gaps." For the typical bacterium that can make all 20 amino acids, there are 1-2 gaps in amino acid biosynthesis pathways. For diverse bacteria and archaea that can utilize a carbon source, there is a complete high-confidence catabolic pathway (including a transporter) just 38% of the time, and there is a complete medium-confidence pathway 63% of the time. Gaps may be due to:

GapMind relies on the predicted proteins in the genome and does not search the six-frame translation. In most cases, you can search the six-frame translation by clicking on links to Curated BLAST for each step definition (in the per-step page).

For more information, see:

If you notice any errors or omissions in the step descriptions, or any questionable results, please let us know

by Morgan Price, Arkin group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory