GapMind for catabolism of small carbon sources

 

Protein HSERO_RS07315 in Herbaspirillum seropedicae SmR1

Annotation: FitnessBrowser__HerbieS:HSERO_RS07315

Length: 596 amino acids

Source: HerbieS in FitnessBrowser

Candidate for 4 steps in catabolism of small carbon sources

Pathway Step Score Similar to Id. Cov. Bits Other hit Other id. Other bits
L-isoleucine catabolism lpd hi dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (EC 1.8.1.4) (characterized) 73% 100% 868.2 leghemoglobin reductase (EC 1.6.2.6) 43% 368.6
L-isoleucine catabolism lpd med lpdA: dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (EC 1.8.1.4) (TIGR01350) 99% 473.9 leghemoglobin reductase (EC 1.6.2.6) 43% 368.6
L-leucine catabolism lpd hi dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (EC 1.8.1.4) (characterized) 73% 100% 868.2 leghemoglobin reductase (EC 1.6.2.6) 43% 368.6
L-leucine catabolism lpd med lpdA: dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (EC 1.8.1.4) (TIGR01350) 99% 473.9 leghemoglobin reductase (EC 1.6.2.6) 43% 368.6
L-threonine catabolism lpd hi dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (EC 1.8.1.4) (characterized) 73% 100% 868.2 leghemoglobin reductase (EC 1.6.2.6) 43% 368.6
L-threonine catabolism lpd med lpdA: dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (EC 1.8.1.4) (TIGR01350) 99% 473.9 leghemoglobin reductase (EC 1.6.2.6) 43% 368.6
L-valine catabolism lpd hi dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (EC 1.8.1.4) (characterized) 73% 100% 868.2 leghemoglobin reductase (EC 1.6.2.6) 43% 368.6
L-valine catabolism lpd med lpdA: dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (EC 1.8.1.4) (TIGR01350) 99% 473.9 leghemoglobin reductase (EC 1.6.2.6) 43% 368.6

Sequence Analysis Tools

View HSERO_RS07315 at FitnessBrowser

Find papers: PaperBLAST

Find functional residues: SitesBLAST

Search for conserved domains

Find the best match in UniProt

Compare to protein structures

Predict transmenbrane helices: Phobius

Predict protein localization: PSORTb

Find homologs in fast.genomics

Fitness BLAST: loading...

Sequence

MSLSEVKVPDIGDFKEVEVIEVMVKVGDTIKVDQSLITVESDKASMEIPSSQAGVVKEVK
VKVGDKVAEGSLLLLVEAAGQAAAAPAPAAPPAPAAAAAPAPAAAPAAAPTAAPTAASFG
GSADVQCDVMVLGGGPGGYSAAFRAADLGLNTVIVEREATLGGVCLNVGCIPSKALLHVA
AVIDETAAMASHGVTFGKPQIDIDKLRAYKDKVIGTMTGGLAGMAKARKVQVVNGDGQFA
GPNHIEVTAADGSKKVVQFKHAIIAAGSSVVNLPFVPQDPRIVDSTGALELRQVPKRMLV
IGGGIIGLEMATVYSTLGARIDVVEMMDGLMQGADRDMVKVWQKFNEKRFDNVMVKTKTV
AVEALPEGIKVTFEAAEAGATAPEPQLYDLVLVAVGRSPNGKKLSADKAGVIVSDRGFIA
VDKQMRTNVPHIFAIGDLVGQPMLAHKAVHEGHVAAEAIAGEKSFFDASVIPSVAYTDPE
VAWVGVTEDEAKAKGIKIEKGHFPWAASGRAVANGRSEGFTKLLFDAETHRIIGGGIVGT
HAGDMIGEVALAIEMGADAVDIGKTIHPHPTLGESLGMAAEVAEGHCTDLPPQRKK

This GapMind analysis is from Sep 17 2021. The underlying query database was built on Sep 17 2021.

Links

Downloads

Related tools

About GapMind

Each pathway is defined by a set of rules based on individual steps or genes. Candidates for each step are identified by using ublast (a fast alternative to protein BLAST) against a database of manually-curated proteins (most of which are experimentally characterized) or by using HMMer with enzyme models (usually from TIGRFam). Ublast hits may be split across two different proteins.

A candidate for a step is "high confidence" if either:

where "other" refers to the best ublast hit to a sequence that is not annotated as performing this step (and is not "ignored").

Otherwise, a candidate is "medium confidence" if either:

Other blast hits with at least 50% coverage are "low confidence."

Steps with no high- or medium-confidence candidates may be considered "gaps." For the typical bacterium that can make all 20 amino acids, there are 1-2 gaps in amino acid biosynthesis pathways. For diverse bacteria and archaea that can utilize a carbon source, there is a complete high-confidence catabolic pathway (including a transporter) just 38% of the time, and there is a complete medium-confidence pathway 63% of the time. Gaps may be due to:

GapMind relies on the predicted proteins in the genome and does not search the six-frame translation. In most cases, you can search the six-frame translation by clicking on links to Curated BLAST for each step definition (in the per-step page).

For more information, see:

If you notice any errors or omissions in the step descriptions, or any questionable results, please let us know

by Morgan Price, Arkin group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory