GapMind for catabolism of small carbon sources

 

Finding step iatA for myo-inositol catabolism in Klebsiella michiganensis M5al

4 candidates for iatA: myo-inositol ABC transporter, ATPase component IatA

Score Gene Description Similar to Id. Cov. Bits Other hit Other id. Other bits
med BWI76_RS00275 ribose ABC transporter ATP-binding protein RbsA Inositol transport ATP-binding protein IatA, component of The myoinositol (high affinity)/ D-ribose (low affinity) transporter IatP/IatA/IbpA. The structure of IbpA with myoinositol bound has been solved (characterized) 42% 98% 394.4 ribose transport, ATP-binding protein RbsA; EC 3.6.3.17 95% 919.5
med BWI76_RS14860 ABC transporter Inositol transport ATP-binding protein IatA, component of The myoinositol (high affinity)/ D-ribose (low affinity) transporter IatP/IatA/IbpA. The structure of IbpA with myoinositol bound has been solved (characterized) 43% 97% 382.5 Inositol transport system ATP-binding protein 45% 432.2
med BWI76_RS07240 D-ribose transporter ATP-binding protein Inositol transport ATP-binding protein IatA, component of The myoinositol (high affinity)/ D-ribose (low affinity) transporter IatP/IatA/IbpA. The structure of IbpA with myoinositol bound has been solved (characterized) 43% 96% 377.1 m-Inositol ABC transporter, ATPase component (itaA) 59% 584.3
med BWI76_RS00660 ABC transporter Inositol transport ATP-binding protein IatA, component of The myoinositol (high affinity)/ D-ribose (low affinity) transporter IatP/IatA/IbpA. The structure of IbpA with myoinositol bound has been solved (characterized) 41% 98% 374.8 RhaT, component of Rhamnose porter (Richardson et al., 2004) (Transport activity is dependent on rhamnokinase (RhaK; AAQ92412) activity (Richardson and Oresnik, 2007) This could be an example of group translocation!) 56% 531.9

Confidence: high confidence medium confidence low confidence
transporter – transporters and PTS systems are shaded because predicting their specificity is particularly challenging.

GapMind searches the predicted proteins for candidates by using ublast (a fast alternative to protein BLAST) to find similarities to characterized proteins or by using HMMer to find similarities to enzyme models (usually from TIGRFams). For alignments to characterized proteins (from ublast), scores of 44 bits correspond to an expectation value (E) of about 0.001.

Also see fitness data for the candidates

Definition of step iatA

Or cluster all characterized iatA proteins

This GapMind analysis is from Sep 17 2021. The underlying query database was built on Sep 17 2021.

Links

Downloads

Related tools

About GapMind

Each pathway is defined by a set of rules based on individual steps or genes. Candidates for each step are identified by using ublast (a fast alternative to protein BLAST) against a database of manually-curated proteins (most of which are experimentally characterized) or by using HMMer with enzyme models (usually from TIGRFam). Ublast hits may be split across two different proteins.

A candidate for a step is "high confidence" if either:

where "other" refers to the best ublast hit to a sequence that is not annotated as performing this step (and is not "ignored").

Otherwise, a candidate is "medium confidence" if either:

Other blast hits with at least 50% coverage are "low confidence."

Steps with no high- or medium-confidence candidates may be considered "gaps." For the typical bacterium that can make all 20 amino acids, there are 1-2 gaps in amino acid biosynthesis pathways. For diverse bacteria and archaea that can utilize a carbon source, there is a complete high-confidence catabolic pathway (including a transporter) just 38% of the time, and there is a complete medium-confidence pathway 63% of the time. Gaps may be due to:

GapMind relies on the predicted proteins in the genome and does not search the six-frame translation. In most cases, you can search the six-frame translation by clicking on links to Curated BLAST for each step definition (in the per-step page).

For more information, see:

If you notice any errors or omissions in the step descriptions, or any questionable results, please let us know

by Morgan Price, Arkin group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory