GapMind for catabolism of small carbon sources

 

Finding step gntC for D-gluconate catabolism in Acidovorax sp. GW101-3H11

5 candidates for gntC: gluconate TRAP transporter, periplasmic solute-binding component

Score Gene Description Similar to Id. Cov. Bits Other hit Other id. Other bits
hi Ac3H11_3226 TRAP-type transport system, periplasmic component, predicted N-acetylneuraminate-binding protein ABC transporter substrate-binding protein (characterized, see rationale) 100% 100% 661.4 Putative TRAP transporter solute receptor DctP, component of The possible disulfide 3,3'-dithiodipropionic acid (DTDP) tripartite transporter, DctMPQ 51% 329.7
hi Ac3H11_3524 TRAP-type C4-dicarboxylate transport system, periplasmic component TRAP dicarboxylate transport system, periplasmic component (DctP-like) (characterized, see rationale) 49% 99% 332 Putative TRAP transporter solute receptor DctP, component of The possible disulfide 3,3'-dithiodipropionic acid (DTDP) tripartite transporter, DctMPQ 46% 290.0
hi Ac3H11_1227 TRAP-type C4-dicarboxylate transport system, periplasmic component TRAP dicarboxylate transport system, periplasmic component (DctP-like) (characterized, see rationale) 48% 100% 308.1 Putative TRAP transporter solute receptor DctP, component of The possible disulfide 3,3'-dithiodipropionic acid (DTDP) tripartite transporter, DctMPQ 45% 289.3
med Ac3H11_161 TRAP-type transport system, periplasmic component, predicted N-acetylneuraminate-binding protein ABC transporter substrate-binding protein (characterized, see rationale) 40% 93% 220.3 Solute-binding protein Veis_3954 85% 548.9
med Ac3H11_2073 TRAP-type C4-dicarboxylate transport system, periplasmic component TRAP dicarboxylate transport system, periplasmic component (DctP-like) (characterized, see rationale) 38% 91% 219.5 Solute-binding protein Veis_3954 40% 203.0

Confidence: high confidence medium confidence low confidence
transporter – transporters and PTS systems are shaded because predicting their specificity is particularly challenging.

GapMind searches the predicted proteins for candidates by using ublast (a fast alternative to protein BLAST) to find similarities to characterized proteins or by using HMMer to find similarities to enzyme models (usually from TIGRFams). For alignments to characterized proteins (from ublast), scores of 44 bits correspond to an expectation value (E) of about 0.001.

Also see fitness data for the candidates

Definition of step gntC

Or cluster all characterized gntC proteins

This GapMind analysis is from Sep 17 2021. The underlying query database was built on Sep 17 2021.

Links

Downloads

Related tools

About GapMind

Each pathway is defined by a set of rules based on individual steps or genes. Candidates for each step are identified by using ublast (a fast alternative to protein BLAST) against a database of manually-curated proteins (most of which are experimentally characterized) or by using HMMer with enzyme models (usually from TIGRFam). Ublast hits may be split across two different proteins.

A candidate for a step is "high confidence" if either:

where "other" refers to the best ublast hit to a sequence that is not annotated as performing this step (and is not "ignored").

Otherwise, a candidate is "medium confidence" if either:

Other blast hits with at least 50% coverage are "low confidence."

Steps with no high- or medium-confidence candidates may be considered "gaps." For the typical bacterium that can make all 20 amino acids, there are 1-2 gaps in amino acid biosynthesis pathways. For diverse bacteria and archaea that can utilize a carbon source, there is a complete high-confidence catabolic pathway (including a transporter) just 38% of the time, and there is a complete medium-confidence pathway 63% of the time. Gaps may be due to:

GapMind relies on the predicted proteins in the genome and does not search the six-frame translation. In most cases, you can search the six-frame translation by clicking on links to Curated BLAST for each step definition (in the per-step page).

For more information, see:

If you notice any errors or omissions in the step descriptions, or any questionable results, please let us know

by Morgan Price, Arkin group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory