Alignments for a candidate for cmutase in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824

GapMind for Amino acid biosynthesis

Alignments for a candidate for cmutase in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824

Align candidate NP_347533.1 CA_C0897 (bifunctional chorismate mutase/shikimate 5-dehydrogenase)
to HMM TIGR01805 (chorismate mutase (EC 5.4.99.5))

# hmmsearch :: search profile(s) against a sequence database
# HMMER 3.3.1 (Jul 2020); http://hmmer.org/
# Copyright (C) 2020 Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
# Freely distributed under the BSD open source license.
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# query HMM file:                  ../tmp/path.aa/TIGR01805.hmm
# target sequence database:        /tmp/gapView.2280.genome.faa
# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Query:       TIGR01805  [M=81]
Accession:   TIGR01805
Description: CM_mono_grmpos: chorismate mutase
Scores for complete sequences (score includes all domains):
   --- full sequence ---   --- best 1 domain ---    -#dom-
    E-value  score  bias    E-value  score  bias    exp  N  Sequence                              Description
    ------- ------ -----    ------- ------ -----   ---- --  --------                              -----------
      2e-39  120.0   9.7      2e-39  120.0   9.7    2.0  2  lcl|NCBI__GCF_000008765.1:NP_347533.1  CA_C0897 bifunctional chorismate


Domain annotation for each sequence (and alignments):
>> lcl|NCBI__GCF_000008765.1:NP_347533.1  CA_C0897 bifunctional chorismate mutase/shikimate 5-dehydrogenase
   #    score  bias  c-Evalue  i-Evalue hmmfrom  hmm to    alifrom  ali to    envfrom  env to     acc
 ---   ------ ----- --------- --------- ------- -------    ------- -------    ------- -------    ----
   1 !  120.0   9.7     2e-39     2e-39       1      81 []       4      84 ..       4      84 .. 0.99
   2 ?   -2.7   0.5       0.4       0.4       8      22 ..     349     364 ..     345     366 .. 0.64

  Alignments for each domain:
  == domain 1  score: 120.0 bits;  conditional E-value: 2e-39
                              TIGR01805  1 LeliRkkideiDdklvkLleeRlelvkevaalKkkngievfDskREqkvldkvlkrvenkeYeetleeffsnll 74
                                           Le+iRk+ide+D+++++L+e+R++lv+eva++K+kn+i+v+DskRE+kv+dk++++++nkeY+e+l+ef++n++
  lcl|NCBI__GCF_000008765.1:NP_347533.1  4 LEEIRKEIDEVDKIITELFEKRMNLVMEVAEYKEKNSIPVSDSKREKKVIDKNIGYLKNKEYSEVLKEFYINFM 77
                                           89************************************************************************ PP

                              TIGR01805 75 dlSkelq 81
                                           +lSk+l+
  lcl|NCBI__GCF_000008765.1:NP_347533.1 78 NLSKKLE 84
                                           ****986 PP

  == domain 2  score: -2.7 bits;  conditional E-value: 0.4
                              TIGR01805   8 idei.DdklvkLleeR 22 
                                            idei  d++ ++lee+
  lcl|NCBI__GCF_000008765.1:NP_347533.1 349 IDEIiVDEIFEVLEEK 364
                                            5554257777777776 PP



Internal pipeline statistics summary:
-------------------------------------
Query model(s):                            1  (81 nodes)
Target sequences:                          1  (367 residues searched)
Passed MSV filter:                         1  (1); expected 0.0 (0.02)
Passed bias filter:                        1  (1); expected 0.0 (0.02)
Passed Vit filter:                         1  (1); expected 0.0 (0.001)
Passed Fwd filter:                         1  (1); expected 0.0 (1e-05)
Initial search space (Z):                  1  [actual number of targets]
Domain search space  (domZ):               1  [number of targets reported over threshold]
# CPU time: 0.00u 0.01s 00:00:00.01 Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
# Mc/sec: 8.39
//
[ok]

This GapMind analysis is from Apr 10 2024. The underlying query database was built on Apr 09 2024.

Downloads

Candidates (tab-delimited)
Steps (tab-delimited)
Rules (tab-delimited)
Protein sequences (fasta format)
Organisms (tab-delimited)
SQLite3 databases

Related tools

About GapMind

Each pathway is defined by a set of rules based on individual steps or genes. Candidates for each step are identified by using ublast (a fast alternative to protein BLAST) against a database of manually-curated proteins (most of which are experimentally characterized) or by using HMMer with enzyme models (usually from TIGRFam). Ublast hits may be split across two different proteins.

A candidate for a step is "high confidence" if either:

ublast finds a hit to a characterized protein at above 40% identity and 80% coverage, and bits >= other bits+10.
- (Hits to curated proteins without experimental data as to their function are never considered high confidence.)
HMMer finds a hit with 80% coverage of the model, and either other identity < 40 or other coverage < 0.75.

where "other" refers to the best ublast hit to a sequence that is not annotated as performing this step (and is not "ignored").

Otherwise, a candidate is "medium confidence" if either:

ublast finds a hit at above 40% identity and 70% coverage (ignoring otherBits).
ublast finds a hit at above 30% identity and 80% coverage, and bits >= other bits.
HMMer finds a hit (regardless of coverage or other bits).

Other blast hits with at least 50% coverage are "low confidence."

Steps with no high- or medium-confidence candidates may be considered "gaps." For the typical bacterium that can make all 20 amino acids, there are 1-2 gaps in amino acid biosynthesis pathways. For diverse bacteria and archaea that can utilize a carbon source, there is a complete high-confidence catabolic pathway (including a transporter) just 38% of the time, and there is a complete medium-confidence pathway 63% of the time. Gaps may be due to:

our ignorance of proteins' functions,
omissions in the gene models,
frame-shift errors in the genome sequence, or
the organism lacks the pathway.

GapMind relies on the predicted proteins in the genome and does not search the six-frame translation. In most cases, you can search the six-frame translation by clicking on links to Curated BLAST for each step definition (in the per-step page).

For more information, see:

the paper from 2019 on GapMind for amino acid biosynthesis
the paper from 2022 on GapMind for carbon sources
the source code
instructions for running GapMind on your computer
changes to Amino acid biosynthesis since the publication.

If you notice any errors or omissions in the step descriptions, or any questionable results, please let us know

by Morgan Price, Arkin group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

GapMind for Amino acid biosynthesis